Revision as of 20:57, 27 September 2005 edit CSTAR (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 8,870 edits →Article for deletion? ← Previous edit		Revision as of 21:09, 4 October 2005 edit undo CarlHewitt (talk \| contribs) 5,700 edits →Disputed statement Next edit →
Line 17: --[[User:CSTAR\|CSTAR]] 20:57, 27 September 2005 (UTC) This is indeed curious. First of all the above abstract talks about synchronizers instead of arbiters. Does the article explain the difference? Not much confusion exists about the practical importance of metastability for arbiters. Convential arbiters unavoidably show metastable behavior in principle and also in practice, if properly designed. The metastability of properly designed arbiters has been measured and well qualified many times in the literature. Is this article informed about the literature? Has anyone ever cited this article? Thanks,--[[User:CarlHewitt\|Carl Hewitt]] 21:09, 4 October 2005 (UTC)

Talk:Indeterminacy in concurrent computation: Difference between revisions