Revision as of 20:43, 4 October 2005 edit MSJapan (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers 20,100 edits added further info on specific item removals to show they were not motivated by "pro-Masonic bias". ← Previous edit		Revision as of 21:27, 4 October 2005 edit undo MSJapan (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers 20,100 edits Arbitration Request Submitted Next edit →
Line 197: IMHO, your best option is to list the article under requests for comments since the two of you are in a revert war, or you can go to arbirtration. I suggest doing one of these for the overall benefit of the article, otherwise it won't function. --[[Image:Ottawa flag.png\|20px]] [[User:Spinboy\|Spinboy]] 20:07, 4 October 2005 (UTC) == Arbitration Request Submitted == On Spinboy's suggestion, I have requested an arbitration on this article. The link is [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration#User:Lightbringer_on_Freemasonry here], and should be updated in the relevant sections by any and all interested parties. [[User:MSJapan\|MSJapan]] 21:27, 4 October 2005 (UTC)

Talk:Freemasonry: Difference between revisions