Content deleted Content added
→about the redirect from Business Process Modeling to this topic: new subsection |
m Lay out |
||
Line 2:
== Regarding the proposed merge (of [[Business process modeling]] into [[Process modeling]]) ==
;Please sign your comments with the Wiki code <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki> at the end of your comments!
"Process modelling" is also a term used by chemical/process engineers to refer to their efforts to model chemical processing plants. BPM should therefore be specified fully, not shortened as in the present article. {{unsigned2|00:21, August 23, 2006| 129.94.6.30}}
:I do not see why, the chemical processing plant is still a business, and as such the modelling of its workings fits within the business process modelling paradigm. [[User:Ansell/Esperanza|<span style="color:#0000FF;">Ans<span style="color:#009000;">e</span>ll</span>]] 07:04, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
Please note that the process modeling for process engineering refer to mathematical models which mimics the actual process. For example, a process model for a blast furnace (used to make steel) would capture all the physico-chemical reactions and try to predict the temperature and completion of various reactions during the charge descent. This is surely not a business process modeling. {{unsigned2|12:04, September 13, 2006 | 219.64.92.39}}
:If this is true, the article surely does not reflect any of what you said (no mention of chemicals, blast furnaces, steel making, or tempature) and only refers to how it's used in a ''business''. [[User:Radagast83|Radagast83]] 20:18, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
Could someone please be more clear about "the possible merge [of what??]" above? It appears that this is a discussion that's been going on for a while but much of this history has been removed, making it more difficult for newcommers to follow.
==
There are currently two articles: [[Process modeling]] and [[Business process modeling]]. This is further confused by the entry for [[Business Process Modeling]] which redirects to [[Process modeling]]. I'd like to remove the exiting [[Business Process Modeling]] redirect. Does anyone object? [[Wikipedia:Naming conventions (capitalization)]] [[User:Karlhauth|Karlhauth]] 13:03, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
Line 58 ⟶ 52:
* [[Function model]]ling
* Software process modeling
And what ever other fields exist here. I think we can develop a article around this with a general intro and a section about types of process modeling. -- [[User:Mdd|Marcel Douwe Dekker]] ([[User talk:Mdd|talk]]) 00:29, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
== Multiple issues ==
I think this current article see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Process_modeling ''here''] has multiple issues:
* There is a long rather undetermined introduction, which doesn't explain to what filed of science it is related, what exact mening it gives to process modelling, and what kind of process modelling, and process modeling exist
* Halfway a section starts focussing on Business Process Modelling, what seems much more detailled.
Now I noticed an older version, see [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Business_process_modeling&oldid=140846800 ''here''] of the [[Business process modelling]] has been merged here 1 July 2007 by Radagast83. I wonder if it would be better split the both and develop both articles separately some more. -- [[User:Mdd|Marcel Douwe Dekker]] ([[User talk:Mdd|talk]]) 00:14, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
| |||