Content deleted Content added
m →Proposed owner override for TC: added information about TC being Unconstitutinal |
m →Unconstitutional=: fixed error in my new section |
||
Line 105:
While it would seem that the idea of Owner Override would be met with praise, some Trusted Computing Group members have instead heralded it as the biggest potential downfall of the TC movement. Owner Override defeats the entire idea of being able to trust other people's computers, remote attestation. Owner Override continues to offer all of the security and enforcement benefits to an owner on his own machine, but loses any ability to ensure another owner cannot waive rules or restrictions on his own computer. Once data is sent to someone else's computer, whether it is a diary, a DRM music file, or a joint project, that person controls what security, if any, their computer will enforce on their copy of that data.
==Unconstitutional
TC IS UNCONSTITUTINAL, it takes away rights and freedoms, ALL BECUASE COMPANIES DON'T WON'T THERE PRESCOUIS SOFTWARE DOWNLOADED, AND IT ALSO MAKES IT SO YOU HAVE TO BUY BRAND NAME COMPUTERS AND CAN'T BUILD YOUR OWN. AND CAN'T CHANGE YOUR OS OR SOFTWARE. IF A PART FRIES IN YOUR COMPUTER YOU CAN'T REPLACE IT WITH AN OLD ONE, BECUASE COMPANIES WANT TO MAKE MORE MONEY FROM YOU BUYING EXPENSIVE NEW STUFF. YOU HAVE TO USE BIG COMPANIES FOR WEB HOSTING INSTEAD OF CHEAP OR HOME BASED. AND YOU CAN'T USE WINDOWS 98, ME, 2000, OR OTHER OLD OPERATING SYSTEMS SO MICROSOFT MAKES MORE MONEY ON PEPOLE BUYING WINDOWS XP. AND YOU CAN’T BUY OR SELL OLD COMPUTERS BECAUSE COMPANIES WANT TO MAKE MORE MONEY OFF NEW ONES.
| |||