Revision as of 13:04, 6 November 2008 edit RichardVeryard (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 3,183 edits →Commonly used?: new section ← Previous edit		Revision as of 14:56, 6 November 2008 edit undo Mdd (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users 54,583 edits →Commonly used?: respons Next edit →
Line 15: EEML is certainly widely discussed. from a reasonably diverse community, so I think this is easily sufficient for establishing the notability of the language. But all the sources appear to be academic papers. Is there any evidence of its actual use? --[[User:RichardVeryard\|RichardVeryard]] ([[User talk:RichardVeryard\|talk]]) 13:04, 6 November 2008 (UTC) :I added two source who actually describe a use of EEML, see John Krogstie (2006) and Paul Johannesson (2008). From what I read this seems like a rather academic use, but this is one way modeling languages developed in the academic world develope. :I do think I would be nice if this article would express some more of these EEML practices and also it's origins. ::-- [[User:Mdd\|Marcel Douwe Dekker]] ([[User talk:Mdd\|talk]]) 14:55, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Talk:Extended Enterprise Modeling Language: Difference between revisions