Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fp code: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 00:34, 29 September 2005

Revision as of 22:05, 7 October 2005

Line 1:

<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">

:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <font color=red>'''Please do not modify it.'''</font> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a [[Wikipedia:Votes for undeletion|Votes for Undeletion]] nomination). No further edits should be made to this page. ''

<!--

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result of the debate was DELETE. [[User:Gyrofrog|Gyrofrog ]] [[User_talk:Gyrofrog|(talk)]] 22:05, 7 October 2005 (UTC)

===[[fp code]]===

plus: [[talk:fp code]], [[fail]], [[outcome]], [[now and fail]], [[now and fail statement]], [[NOW AND FAIL statement]], [[do statement]] and [[DO statement]]. (I think that is all.)

Line 14 ⟶ 20:

:'''Comment''': I purposely didn't use jargons and to me, although it is not important, it is consistent and complete. I could elaborate further, especially its application in computation but I thought this is for general audience. MCB, it is incomprehensible to you, probably because I didn't explain it using conventional logic, which was my intention. Why is it a nonsense if it works? It can work with a very simple program and it will automatically reduce to an outcome. Sorry if I made a mistake in writing this article. It seems you guys prefer me being a machine than being a human. I have a tendancy to think like a machine but I thought that was not appropriate. Do what you like with articles, but I could fill twenty or more full articles with the foundation of what I have wrote in Fp code, which I chose not to. My understanding was that this is for general audience and I had an interesting idea so I wanted to share it. I could do much more without being technical, such as to write a decoder program like in Geek Code. That may well happen if I do decide to develop this concept further. Please do understand that it was not my intention to post a garbage article. Bye. [[User:Pyenos|Pyenos]] 23:53, 28 September 2005 (UTC)

* '''Delete'''. No original research, also, [[User:Pyenos]] is basically describing [[Automata Theory]] and [[Compiler theory]] [[User:Project2501a|Project2501a]] 00:34, 29 September 2005 (UTC)

:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <font color=red>'''Please do not modify it.'''</font> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an [[Wikipedia:Votes for undeletion|undeletion request]]). No further edits should be made to this page.</div>