Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections January 2006/Candidate statements/Redwolf24: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
questions |
Responses |
||
Line 11:
''Q: How old are you and what do you do? (If student, please state what subjects you are studying.)''
A: I am 15, as most people know, which may cost me some votes. I am enrolled in the standard subjects, Math English Science History Gym. I took the S.A.T's at age 12 and got a 1300(/1600) if you want to test my brain...
''Q: How many hours a month do you think you will need to be a good Arbitrator and are you really willing to put in the time?''
A: I'm sure I'll spend a lot of time being one, but I already spend a lot of time on the wiki, it'd be a piece of cake, I have the time as I already spend 5 hours+ a day on the wiki. So unless you need more than 300 hours, I think I can handle it.
''Q: If chosen, you will need to arbitrate on disputes arising from the creation or revision of articles. Experience of creating and revising articles yourself, particularly where it has involved collaboration, is very valuable in understanding the mindset of disputants who come to arbitration. With reference to your own edits in the main article namespace, please demonstrate why you think you have the right experience to be a good arbitrator.''
A: As 172 has said, article editing is not my top priority. I have 20 to 30% of my edits there. However I am an exception: I am a mediator, in fact the chair of the medcom. I don't know how I could be a mediator if I couldn't place myself in the shoes of others. That should be the number 1 skill of the arbcom, the ability to place one's self in another's shoes.
''Q: Please list out what other Wikipedia usernames you have edited under.''
A: none, just Redwolf24.
| |||