Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fox Learning Systems: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m Signing comment by Zdubya36 - "" |
SiobhanHansa (talk | contribs) →Fox Learning Systems: comment on sources |
||
Line 6:
*'''Merge/Redirect''' – Fits more into [[Debra Fox|Ms. Fox’s]] article than a stand alone piece at this time. <font face="Times New Roman">[[User:Shoessss|'''S'''''hoesss'''''S''']] <sup>[[User talk:Shoessss|''Talk'']]</sup></font> 20:40, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
*'''Keep'''. The article's references displayed as raw URLs, so it wasn't clear which were notable. I formatted the references to include the news outlet name, the article name and the date of publication. A few are press releases, but I think http://www.post-gazette.com/businessnews/20001110fox2.asp and http://e-magnify.com/entrepreneurs_view.asp?ID=12 represents substantial coverage. -- [[User:Eastmain|Eastmain]] ([[User talk:Eastmain|talk]]) 21:18, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
:'''Comment''' Isn't the [[Pittsburgh Post-Gazette]] a local paper? And the e-magnify piece seemed like a fairly straight forward puff piece intended to highlight an entrepreneur rather than take a critical look at the business. For the sake of completeness I would mention that as well as press releases there is another newspaper reference to the [[Pittsburgh Tribune-Review]] but again that seems like a local paper to me. -- [[User_Talk:SiobhanHansa|SiobhanHansa]] 22:44, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
*<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Business|list of Business-related deletion discussions]]. </small><small>—[[User:Eastmain|Eastmain]] ([[User talk:Eastmain|talk]]) 21:22, 10 November 2008 (UTC)</small>
*<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Pennsylvania|list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions]]. </small><small>—[[User:Eastmain|Eastmain]] ([[User talk:Eastmain|talk]]) 21:22, 10 November 2008 (UTC)</small>
|