Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fox Learning Systems: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m Signing comment by 67.186.28.104 - "" |
SiobhanHansa (talk | contribs) →Fox Learning Systems: Comment - Pittsburgh Post-Gazette vs. The New York Times. You really think that's a valid comparison? |
||
Line 8:
:'''Comment''' Isn't the [[Pittsburgh Post-Gazette]] a local paper? And the e-magnify piece seemed like a fairly straight forward puff piece intended to highlight an entrepreneur rather than take a critical look at the business. For the sake of completeness I would mention that as well as press releases there is another newspaper reference to the [[Pittsburgh Tribune-Review]] but again that seems like a local paper to me. -- [[User_Talk:SiobhanHansa|SiobhanHansa]] 22:44, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
:'''Comment on Comment''' Your above logic could be applied to anybody that sites the New York Times or LA Times. Are they not local papers as well. They didn't site the Erie County Nifty Nickel. These are 3 articles that are as legitimate as any on wikipedia, Supported by Press Releases... Debate the information pertaining to the press releases if that is your issue, the whole article should not be deleted. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/67.186.28.104|67.186.28.104]] ([[User talk:67.186.28.104|talk]]) 23:14, 10 November 2008 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
::The New York Times and to a lesser extent the LA Times are sold all over the world. It wasn't my impression that this was generally the case for either of the two Pittsburgh papers - though maybe I'm wrong. -- [[User_Talk:SiobhanHansa|SiobhanHansa]] 00:06, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
*<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Business|list of Business-related deletion discussions]]. </small><small>—[[User:Eastmain|Eastmain]] ([[User talk:Eastmain|talk]]) 21:22, 10 November 2008 (UTC)</small>
*<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Pennsylvania|list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions]]. </small><small>—[[User:Eastmain|Eastmain]] ([[User talk:Eastmain|talk]]) 21:22, 10 November 2008 (UTC)</small>
Line 15 ⟶ 16:
*'''Ammendment''': I have added a new section to the Fox Learning Systems page about a medical study they conducted that was published in a the [[American Journal of Psychiatry]] this should please [[SiobhanHansa]] as it is not local nor a puff piece and published in a major medical journal. Included in the sitations are an article about the study and the study itself. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/67.186.28.104|67.186.28.104]] ([[User talk:67.186.28.104|talk]]) 23:49, 10 November 2008 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:These are much more compelling as evidence of notability. Thanks for adding them. -- [[User_Talk:SiobhanHansa|SiobhanHansa]] 00:06, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
| |||