Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fox Learning Systems: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
Line 19:
:'''Disclosure''' the above comment with the IP is mine Zdubya36, i don't want anyone to think i was trying to use multiple users to get a point across... (i logged into a different computer but forgot to log into wikipedia before i posted)
:These are much more compelling as evidence of notability. Thanks for adding them. -- [[User_Talk:SiobhanHansa|SiobhanHansa]] 00:06, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' A nonnotable provider of educational material for nursing home staff. That people associated with it produced one product about which they wrotea paper which appeared in a peer review journal is not notability. Notability would be judged for this the same as for other research groups--dozens or hundreds of references to it. It is necessary to show wide use. '''[[User:DGG|DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG|talk]]) 02:31, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
|