Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fox Learning Systems: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
Line 20:
:These are much more compelling as evidence of notability. Thanks for adding them. -- [[User_Talk:SiobhanHansa|SiobhanHansa]] 00:06, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' A nonnotable provider of educational material for nursing home staff. That people associated with it produced one product about which they wrotea paper which appeared in a peer review journal is not notability. Notability would be judged for this the same as for other research groups--dozens or hundreds of references to it. It is necessary to show wide use. '''[[User:DGG|DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG|talk]]) 02:31, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
:'''Comment''' If you would read further you would see there are other studies in which they were involved... another of which is sited in their wikipedia site. Not only do they produce educational materials but also do independent studies to help the learners as well as the elder care community. This company did not produce a product based on their studies. They distributed this information to the industry. A peer review journal is notable. I once again go back to if "peer" review is not notable then anything published in JAMA is not notable.
| |||