Talk:Comparison of software for molecular mechanics modeling: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Reference sections: what kind of references that is not already there? |
|||
Line 3:
[[User:Joerg Kurt Wegner|JKW]] ([[User talk:Joerg Kurt Wegner|talk]]) 22:20, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
:Well each entry is linked to its own article, which presumably has references, or it it is linked to a reference. What else do you want? --[[User:Bduke|<span style="color:#002147;">'''Bduke'''</span>]] [[User_talk:Bduke|<span style="color:#002147;">'''(Discussion)'''</span>]] 01:55, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
::I think it is a good idea to always provide references (the original reference in, say, [[PubMed]]). This is because not every website makes it easy to find the associated references. I would suggest using an abbreviated form. Something like: [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016%2FS0263-7855%2898%2980030-1 Bacon D, ''et al.'', 1998] (for Raster3D and where the link is the DOI number). I also suggest we try to add all of the license types to each entry. --[[User:Thorwald|Thorwald]] ([[User talk:Thorwald|talk]]) 04:28, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
| |||