Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fox Learning Systems: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Line 25:
*'''Keep''' They have provided sufficient sitations to prove they are a note worthy company. They produce a widely distributed product. They are a multifacited company that works with/for large corporations. They perform their own studies which are sited in industry publications, and which their unique findings are used by other industries and companies. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/67.186.28.104|67.186.28.104]] ([[User talk:67.186.28.104|talk]]) 03:17, 11 November 2008 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
*'''Merge/Redirect''' to [[Debra Fox]]. There seems to be a lot of ad-speak at this moment, but with or without it, I don't see the company's notability. Having a laundry list of notable clients doesn't make a business notable itself. --[[User:CliffC|CliffC]] ([[User talk:CliffC|talk]]) 17:19, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
'''Keep'''This company is notable in the elder-care industry. Not every business on wikipedia has worldwide exposure. The question should be "is the business notable in a certain industry?" The answer for Fox Learning Systems is YES! If you were familiar with the LTC industry, there would be no question as to the notability of this company. Moreover, the Post Gazette is a legitimate enough source to justify wikipedia's legitimacy requirments. The notion that it needs to be in a "national paper", of which there are only about 5, is completely ridiculous. I know there are not any requirements set in stone for what a reliable source is, but lets use common sense. The Post Gazette is the main newspaper for the Pittsburgh region, with over 400,000 readers on weekdays and over 600,000 on Sundays. Plus their website gets a significant number of hits. [[User:Theovoice|Theovoice]] ([[User talk:Theovoice|talk]]) 21:15, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
| |||