Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fox Learning Systems: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Fox Learning Systems: comment |
|||
Line 29:
::I will put up some industry sources soon to put the issue of notability to rest. Please take a look at the following wiki and tell me how it meets notability if FLS doesn't. My opinion is both of these pages should be kept. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viv%C3%ADsimo Both of these companies are notable in a certain industry. I know nothing about Search Enterprise software field, but I can see from their sources, which are some press releases and other technological journals, that they are notable. [[User:Theovoice|Theovoice]] ([[User talk:Theovoice|talk]]) 14:57, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
:::'''Comment''' Voice, [[WP:OTHERSTUFF]] is never a valid argument for inclusion. --[[User:CliffC|CliffC]] ([[User talk:CliffC|talk]]) 15:19, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
:::'''Comment''' Point taken. I have added two more LTC industry sources that cite grants being funded to FLS. If government agencies like the NIH and NIMH (National Institute of Mental Health) find Fox Learning Systems notable enough to give large amounts of grant money, then so should wikipedia. When can we finally put this discussion to rest? [[User:Theovoice|Theovoice]] ([[User talk:Theovoice|talk]]) 15:27, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
| |||