Revision as of 19:27, 15 October 2008 edit SineBot (talk \| contribs) Bots 2,564,711 edits m Signing comment by 199.246.40.54 - "→Title: " ← Previous edit		Revision as of 02:54, 14 November 2008 edit undo Legobot (talk \| contribs) Bots 1,703,077 edits m Robot: Substituting {{Unsigned}} Next edit →
Line 50: The fact and concepts of table functions should be added. The statement that stored procedures return a "set of rows" is too restrictive. A stored procedure may return result sets (multiple!), but it doesn't have to.{{<small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:141.35.14.130\|141.35.14.130}}]] ([[User talk:141.35.14.130\|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/141.35.14.130\|contribs]]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> :[[WP:BOLD\|Be bold!]] This is not something I know a lot about, feel free to clean it up! — <span style="text-decoration: none;">[[User:Revragnarok\|<font color="#696969">RevRagnarok</font>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Revragnarok \|Talk]] [[Special:Contributions/Revragnarok\|Contrib]]</sup></span> 20:11, 28 July 2006 (UTC) ::As far as I can tell, the SQL standard further does not include user defined functions--so variable syntax doesn't seem relevant. You might want to add another example or a description to the article explaining this.

Talk:User-defined function: Difference between revisions