Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fox Learning Systems: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Fox Learning Systems: struck delete |
|||
Line 25:
::I've taken a much closer look at the studies and can't find that they indicate notability. The one in a prestigious Journal ([[American Journal of Psychiatry|AJP]]) does not look at the effectiveness of FLS's product but at a quality improvement protocol of which their product happened to be a part - it may be that any training product would have been as effective - plus one of the studies author is Dr. Rosen - spouse of Debra Fox and co-founder of FLS. So not there's not even independence in it being picked to be part of the protocol. Other published studies are just well done product testing - and as yet there's no evidence in the article that the results have been particular influential. -- [[User_Talk:SiobhanHansa|SiobhanHansa]] 22:21, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
:::I appreciate your thorough assesment and help forming the page. I do still disagree with you in the merit of nobility but i believe you have put a fair effort into looking into the site as i feel you did not do before marking it for deletion. there will be many more things added to this site including people that have used the studies in their studies. another study about strokes that they have performed and some other information. About the studies... Fox Learning Systems headed all of these studies and hired all of those doctors for their research... which is why dr. rosen would be the author. I know this company is notable and as it stands i am more than willing to have someone judge it for deletion because it is a lot stronger than some of the content that currently lives on wikipedia and was unfairly marked for deletion. At this point i have provided more than enough evidence to its nobility and i am not trying to change your opinion at this point because i feel nothing would. but again thank you for helping form the site to wikipedias standards... please check back in and review the changes i will make in the next couple days... maybe i can change your mind[[[[User:Zdubya36|Zdubya36]] ([[User talk:Zdubya36|talk]]) 00:39, 12 November 2008 (UTC)]]
*<s>'''Delete''' A nonnotable provider of educational material for nursing home staff. That people associated with it produced one product about which they wrotea paper which appeared in a peer review journal is not notability. Notability would be judged for this the same as for other research groups--dozens or hundreds of references to it. It is necessary to show wide use. '''[[User:DGG|DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG|talk]]) 02:31, 11 November 2008 (UTC)</s> struck on the basis of JR's comments below. '''[[User:DGG|DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG|talk]]) 16:58, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
:'''Comment''' If you would read further you would see there are other studies in which they were involved... another of which is sited in their wikipedia site. Not only do they produce educational materials but also do independent studies to help the learners as well as the elder care community. This company did not produce a product based on their studies. They distributed this information to the industry. A peer review journal is notable. I once again go back to if "peer" review is not notable then anything published in JAMA is not notable. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/67.186.28.104|67.186.28.104]] ([[User talk:67.186.28.104|talk]]) 03:10, 11 November 2008 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
*'''Keep''' They have provided sufficient sitations to prove they are a note worthy company. They produce a widely distributed product. They are a multifacited company that works with/for large corporations. They perform their own studies which are sited in industry publications, and which their unique findings are used by other industries and companies. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/67.186.28.104|67.186.28.104]] ([[User talk:67.186.28.104|talk]]) 03:17, 11 November 2008 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
| |||