Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections January 2006/Candidate statements/Redwolf24: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
El Sandifer (talk | contribs) |
response to Snowy |
||
Line 34:
At fifteen, and with six months experience, you seem, at least superficially, less qualified than many for a seat on the committee. What an you do to counter that impression? [[User:Snowspinner|Snowspinner]] 05:07, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
:Let's put it this way... its not time spent in days, its time spent in HOURS. If you've been here since 2003, and you spend an hour a week, then people who don't bother to research at all will say you're a better candidate. However there's me, and I spend hours every day on this site. I've read all the policies and most of the pages in the Wikipedia namespace. Anything I have to do as an arbitrator I have been doing as the medcom chair. Analyze evidence? Yup, have to, to make sure the RfM is legit. Know what cases to accept and which to reject? Again, yes. As a mediator (rather than the chair) I have to be able to communicate, remain cool, and put myself in people's shoes. And as for age, that shouldn't matter... Wikipedia is a utopia of all races sexes religions and ages living as equals, and in fact I never had to say my age, but I don't think the community will specifically care about age. [[User:Redwolf24|<font color="darkblue">R</font>]][[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<font color="green">e</font>]][[User:Redwolf24|<font color="darkblue">dwolf24</font>]] ([[User talk:Redwolf24|talk]]) 22:39, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
| |||