Content deleted Content added
→Issues with section Description?: new section |
Fresheneesz (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 34:
[[User:Baccala@freesoft.org|Baccala@freesoft.org]] 21:49, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
:: I think the following statement applies, and is confusingly written:
:::''Also, the Risch algorithm is not an "algorithm" literally, because it needs as a part to check if some expression is equivalent to zero. And for a common meaning of what an "elementary function" is it's not known whether such an algorithm exists or not''
:: That sentence needs to be put into the intro if its correct, it needs to be sourced, and if its true we need to stop calling it an algorithm. [[User:Fresheneesz|Fresheneesz]] ([[User talk:Fresheneesz|talk]]) 07:40, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
== Possibly an error? ==
| |||