Movement Charter/Content/Hubs/fr: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 14:32, 26 July 2023

Revision as of 14:33, 26 July 2023

Line 67:

=== devrait ===

Avant l'approbation d'un nouveau hub, les membres potentiels du hub doivent préparer une analyse démontrant qu'un hub apporterait une valeur ajoutée au mouvement. Il peut s'agir d'une amélioration en termes d'efficacité, mais aussi de la façon dont il aide les autres à amplifier leur voix et à exploiter de nouvelles capacités. Il est important de concevoir un modèle de stratégie et de communication qui implique les affiliés et les individus et les consulte régulièrement. Veiller à ce que des opinions diverses soient exprimées prend du temps, mais cela permet de créer des liens durables et de garantir une coopération constructive.

<span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">Prior to approval of a new hub, the potential hub members should prepare an analysis that demonstrates that a hub would provide added value to the movement. It may mean better in terms of efficiency, but also how it helps others to amplify their voice and tap into new capacities. It is important to design a model of strategy and communication that involves affiliates and individuals, and consults them regularly. Ensuring that diverse opinions are voiced takes time, but it also creates lasting bonds and ensures constructive cooperation.</span>

<span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">Hubs should collaborate with other Wikimedia organizations, including other hubs, informal groups, and individuals that seek their advice or ask their support. They are expected to stay informed of the related activities of other hubs and movement organizations, so as to know where they have common interests or goals (example: how to successfully develop a new affiliate, how to organize an editing event).</span>