Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 02:41, 15 October 2005

Revision as of 04:38, 15 October 2005

Line 1,113:

::Keep in mind that not all articles have the region name listed; I did a search using the [[département]] information, but that wasn't always listed either. And in the case you cited, I only looked for ''Bretagne''; I've updated the count to include the results from searching for ''Brittany''. I couldn't find any stubs using ''Breizh''. Note also that I limited my seach to articles currently marked with <nowiki>{{France-geo-stub}}</nowiki>. I've also updated the counts for ''Nord-Pas-de-Calais'' after refining the search - 23 articles with both département names, and 35 each using one name = 93 articles.

::I don't think we need a separate Paris stub. None of these proposed stub categories will fill two pages, which is not an overwhelming number to search through. For the record, 130 of those stubs are for Paris, which makes it the ''second''-largest département, after Calvados (in Basse-Normandie) with 206. Rhône is third, with 90.[[User:Mindmatrix|Mindmatrix]] 02:41, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

:::Not 100% sure but Breizh may only refer to the Breton language anyway. Did you add in those marked "Corsica" and "Picardy" to those marked "Corse" and "Picardie"? :) BTW, when it comes to making the templates, I propose that we ignore accents and stick to the common English names where they exist (Brittany/Corsica/Normandy, etc). It makes sense to use accents in articles and category names, but I think we can make do without them for the templates themselves. [[User:Grutness|Grutness]]...<font color=green><small>''[[User_talk:Grutness|wha?''</small></font>]] 04:38, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

=== Poland bio stubs split ===