Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections January 2006/Candidate statements/DG: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 02:17, 17 October 2005

Revision as of 02:18, 17 October 2005

Line 1:

My statement is reproduced here:

:Yes, I realise that everyone else who is standing for election is filling their statement with abstract philosophical views, but I don't think that's the most effective and pragmatic approach. I intend to bring a (sorely needed) sense of humour and perspective to the proceedings of the committee. Perhaps then disputes could be handled more fairly and efficiently. Excessive seriousness and organisation can be counter-productive to any work. With work so important and serious as that of this committee, airs of seriousness or importance could be lethal [[User:DG|D.]] [[User_talk:DG|G.]] 02:17, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

=Questions=