Wikipedia:Graphics Lab/Image workshop/Archive/Dec 2008: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
DyceBot (talk | contribs)
m Archiving 1 stale section and 2 resolved sections.
DyceBot (talk | contribs)
m Archiving 1 stale section and 2 resolved sections.
Line 165:
::This jpg version doesn't have any sourcing to prove that it meets [[WP:RS]] so it couldn't really be used for an FA. I recommend using as our base a map sourced from a reliable place so the SVG will be well sourced as well. [[User:Grenavitar|gren]] [[User talk:Grenavitar|グレン]] 12:58, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
:I found an alternative map to use as a base if someone wants to take a crack at this. [[User:Kmusser|Kmusser]] ([[User talk:Kmusser|talk]]) 18:41, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
== Wings of a dragonfly ==
{{Stale|1=[[User:DyceBot|DyceBot]] ([[User talk:DyceBot|talk]]) 08:02, 3 December 2008 (UTC)}}
 
<center><gallery>
Image:Wings of a dragonfly.jpg|Macro shot of wings of a dragonfly .
Image:Wings of a dragonfly2.jpg|Another shot with the dragonfly in focus too.
</gallery></center>
'''Article(s):'''
'''Request:''' I would like someone to improve these pictures so that I can submit them to the already well endorsed Dragonfly article. I guess the images need a bit of sharpening and slight colour corrections. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
'''Graphist opinion:''' I apologize in advance if this seems a little harsh but honestly, these images are not going to be improved with sharpening. There is simply not enough detail there to sharpen. You need to retake the images with better lighting, focus (get the wings to lie along the focal plane) and more depth of field. WP has a lot of very good dragonfly images so you are up against some very steep competition and with all the PP in the world, these are not going to come close. [[User:Mfield|Mfield]] ([[User talk:Mfield|talk]]) 04:41, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
=Resolved=
== Income tax ==