Content deleted Content added
Line 227:
* Of COURSE the "scientific community" rejects the evidence of intelligent design as "creationist pseudo-science": if they didn't; they'd lose their jobs! The "evolutionist" industry stands to lose millions; perhaps BILLIONS of dollars in revenues if their "pet theory" gets discredited and dis-proven. Of COURSE they are going to fight "tooth-and-nail" for it. If any "scientists" become convinced by the evidence of intelligent design (which is over-whelming), they usually become Christian believers not too long afterward. Then, as soon as they say anything about it, they lose their jobs. The colleges and government agencies have been "packed with radicals" for decades; and they view most Christians as their mortal enemies. These radicals practice "economic cleansing"; reasoning that if Christians can't work; they can't get paid; and without any money, "they won't have any influence". (Oct.)
* Also, it's not true that "intelligent design does not constitute a theory, because it cannot be scientifically measured". The scientific community wastes billions of dollars every year on their "pet projects", without uncovering any new evidence. They STILL haven't been able to find any real evidence to support the theory of evolution. Archaeologists, paleontologists and "anthro-apologists" still rely on "a tooth here; a bone there" to "re-construct" entire skeletons upon. The entire body of "hard evidence" for evolution would easily fit upon a single table (except for all the text-books written on the subject). Can they deny it? Where's the "missing link"? There should be theoretically, MILLIONS of such things; show me one of them. Also, the "scientific community" engages in "research" into "UFO's", "ghosts" and "ESP"; attempting to "measure" such un-measurable things. They cry that the evidence (in the case of UFO's) has been "covered-up"; even as they seek to suppress all information related to intelligent design. And the "cultural anthropologists" are constantly digging up ancient artifacts from long-disappeared pagan societies, although the items obviously represented their pagan "religions". (These "scientific puritans" see no difficulty with a "separation of church and state" here.) These statues and other "idols" are routinely placed in modern-day museums, and are given great respectability, along with the myths they represent; anything except items containing the archaelogical history of Christianity; these things are purged, whenever possible. The current situation today is like a "scientific Inquisition"; which attempts to find and root out supporters of the intelligent design concept. But, new ideas die hard. (Oct.)
| |||