Content deleted Content added
MiszaBot II (talk | contribs) m Archiving 2 thread(s) from Template talk:WPBannerMeta. |
MiszaBot II (talk | contribs) m Archiving 2 thread(s) from Template talk:WPBannerMeta. |
||
Line 198:
I think there is a sortkey missing from the template. I noticed that since the change to WPbannermeta the category [[:Category:Top-importance physics articles]] is sorting almost all entries under T (for talk). This behavior is usually caused by not piping <nowiki>{{PAGENAME}}</nowiki> to the category links in templates. Having done some snooping, it does in fact seem that [[Template:WPBannerMeta/importancescale]] is not piping the magic word in the category declarations. This seems like a bug. ([[User:TimothyRias|TimothyRias]] ([[User talk:TimothyRias|talk]]) 15:38, 20 November 2008 (UTC))
:{{fixed}}, although I suspect that this conceals a deeper issue with the functioning of the {{para|listas}} parameter. <font color="forestgreen">[[User:Happy-melon|'''Happy''']]</font>‑<font color="darkorange">[[User talk:Happy-melon|'''melon''']]</font> 23:52, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
== NA-Class ==
Question: I understood that NA-Class is not used when the full quality scale is used. (Because all the non-articles have classes.) However the bannermeta is complaining that [[:Category:NA-Class AFC articles]] doesn't exist on the [[Template:WPAFC]] page. [[User talk:Msgj|MSGJ]] 10:11, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
:NA-Class ''is'' available when the full quality scale is used; setting {{tlx|WikiProject Foo|2=class=NA}} will ''always'' set it to NA-Class. When the full quality scale is ''not'' used, NA-Class is a 'catchall' category for all the other complicated classes; think of it as there being a scale of FA/FL/A/GA/B/C/Start/Stub/List/?/NA, with the option to ''subdivide'' NA into Template/Category/Portal/Redirect/etcetcetc. So NA-Class is always in use, so its category is always required. <font color="forestgreen">[[User:Happy-melon|'''Happy''']]</font>‑<font color="darkorange">[[User talk:Happy-melon|'''melon''']]</font> 11:03, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
::I don't fully understand. If the full quality scale is used then there is no reason for any page to be classed as NA, is there? Indeed it is better if it not available because then people are more likely to classify it correctly. [[User talk:Msgj|MSGJ]] 11:55, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
:::Nonetheless some projects use it, so it has to be supported. I'm not saying it makes sense! I can see the logic behind saying that template examples genuinely are "not applicable", although with the category exemption it's easier just to classify it as FA-Class and stick {{para|category|no}}. <font color="forestgreen">[[User:Happy-melon|'''Happy''']]</font>‑<font color="darkorange">[[User talk:Happy-melon|'''melon''']]</font> 14:55, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
::::You could always create a page similar to [[Template:OH-Project/hide]]. (I don't think this one's documented anywhere though) <font color="green" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Stepshep|§hep]]</font> • <font color="green" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User talk:Stepshep|¡Talk to me!]]</font> 02:02, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
:::::Mysterious things may be in the works... watch this space (and poke me if it doesn't seem to be being filled <tt>:D</tt>)... <font color="forestgreen">[[User:Happy-melon|'''Happy''']]</font>‑<font color="darkorange">[[User talk:Happy-melon|'''melon''']]</font> 11:51, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
== Problem with image right ==
An example is at [[Talk:Biratnagar]], with image_right on, the comments do not go the full length of the box, but stop at the start of the image on the right. I am using Firefox 3.0.4.. —[[User:Borgarde|Borgarde]]<sup>[[User Talk:Borgarde|talk]]</sup> 03:01, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
| |||