Content deleted Content added
→Obstacles in ascertaining race: Added link to forensics |
|||
Line 13:
No genetic test can classify an individual as black or white. However, race is not based on genetics; it is based on [[phenotype]]. It is within this framework that the discussion of the racial identity of ancient Egyptians is generally framed.
The remains of ancient Egyptians available for study today generally have deteriorated sigificantly and have been subjected to [[embalming]]. While scientific testing and forensic examination provide many clues, the debate over the racial identity of dynastic Egypt continues. In the
[[Image:Tut_Guardian_Statue.jpg|thumbnail|left|160px|Jet-black guardian statue of Tutankhamun]]
Line 20:
Objects of art depicting Ancient Egyptians would seem to hold tremendous promise. Paintings from many other eras serve as near-photographs. Unfortunately for the question of race in Ancient Egypt, the Egyptians seem to have been rather unconstrained in their use of color for skin tones. As with modern marble and bronze statues, Egyptian artists often seem to have valued the nature of the base [[Medium|media]] over the color of the subject. Many renditions of skin tone are a [[red ochre]], which does little but frustrate any hypothesis. Additionally, color was often used in clearly symbolic fashion, as in the guardian statues in Tutankhamun's tomb. However, in some recovered objects, artists seem to have depicted skin tones in a lifelike manner. Compounding problems is the elite and religious nature of much art in ancient Egypt. Expensive carvings in temples and crypts may not reflect the reality of the majority of the Ancient Egyptian populace.
Beyond the scientific difficulties are the political roadblocks. Different factions have various motivations, some wholesome, some not, for claiming Ancient Egyptian heritage as either solely their own, or as the result of a multi-ethnic society. As illustrated in the uproar over the recent reconstruction of
==Kemet -- "black land"==
|