Content deleted Content added
Line 13:
:Hi Marcel, I think events have overtaken you. GRL is now part of an international standard, based on [[i*]], which makes it considerably more notable than EEML. See [http://www.cs.toronto.edu/~eric/ Professor Eric Yu's homepage]. So I think GRL really needs its own article now. --[[User:RichardVeryard|RichardVeryard]] ([[User talk:RichardVeryard|talk]]) 14:36, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
::I just checked and it seems you are right. There seems to be some more representation on [[Goal-oriented Requirements Language]] (also written as [[Goal-oriented Requirement Language]]...!? ) then on EEML. Suddenly merging GRL here doesn't seems such a logic choice any more. I have no problem splitting this article in two again again. The GRL article still exist as a redirect. I could easily be undone. But it would be nice if that article would be improved some more first. Any interest? -- [[User:Mdd|Marcel Douwe Dekker]] ([[User talk:Mdd|talk]]) 20:33, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
== Commonly used? ==
| |||