Content deleted Content added
Cat for deletion |
|||
Line 501:
As for dhimmi, I'm not altogether convinced that it's justified to delete the thing inserted about Ibn Kathir. I agree that your source appears to back you up, but so does his seem to back him up. That means that we need to either: (a) find a strong basis for disregarding it, based on solid sources; or (b) put it properly into context, again based on solid sources, and provide a more solid account of the general views of contemporary Islamologues as well as, preferably, contemporary ulama. I will try to do something on it when I get back to Damascus. I've left a note to roughly that effect on the talk page, feel free to reply there or on my Talk. [[User:Palmiro|Palmiro]] | [[User talk:Palmiro|Talk]] 14:51, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
I am not an expert on Ibn Kahtir, I just wanted to keep the sura 9:29. I think that from a theological point of view, the dhimmi status is justified by this Sura as much as the Omar pact. Both element should be there. Note that the dhimmi status is not exclusive to Sunni Islam, an that Omar represent Sunni Islam only .--[[User:Equitor|equitor]] 21:18, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
== Cat for deletion ==
| |||