Wikipedia:Graphics Lab/Image workshop/Archive/Dec 2008: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 08:02, 25 December 2008

Revision as of 08:02, 26 December 2008

Line 316:

'''Graphist opinion:''' I performed a series of corrections on #2 and uploaded it as #3 in the gallery. Corrected levels, adjusted color balance to remove atmospheric color cast, noise reduction and sharpening. [[User:Mfield|Mfield]] ([[User talk:Mfield|talk]]) 02:52, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

== Fiat Palio Multijet Diesel photo ==

{{Stale|1=[[User:DyceBot|DyceBot]] ([[User talk:DyceBot|talk]]) 08:02, 18 December 2008 (UTC)}}

<center><gallery>

Image:Fiat Palio Stile Multijet Diesel.jpg|Photo of the Fiat Palio 1.3 Multijet Diesel in India

Image:Fiat Palio Stile Multijet Diesel1.jpg| Lowered contrast, brightness, lowered some glare.

Image:Fiat Palio Stile Multijet Diesel-edit1.jpg|Tone down highlights and lift shadows on car, remove pylon reflection on hood, convert image profile from AdobeRGB to sRGB for correct web color display by [[User:Mfield|Mfield]]

</gallery></center>

'''Article(s):''' [[Fiat Palio]]

'''Request:''' Can someone please generally improve the image? There is a bit of glare on the hood and the windscreen and the sunshine is a bit too bright. [[User:Ganeshrg|Ganeshrg]] ([[User talk:Ganeshrg|talk]]) 07:10, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

'''Graphist opinion:'''

Attempted. --[[User:Kamangir1214|Kamangir1214]] ([[User talk:Kamangir1214|talk]]) 05:18, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

:Please do not resample the image to a lower resolution (in addition with so bad antialiasing - see the "stairs" on the lower edge of the left window). --[[User:Pabouk|pabouk]] ([[User talk:Pabouk|talk]]) 16:18, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

*Thanks Kamangir1214 for the effort. I am still looking for a more general improvement on the image though. Would anyone like to take this up? [[User:Ganeshrg|Ganeshrg]] ([[User talk:Ganeshrg|talk]]) 18:13, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Added another edit - Tone down highlights and lift shadows on car, remove pylon reflection on hood, convert image profile from AdobeRGB to sRGB for correct web color display. No resize. [[User:Mfield|Mfield]] ([[User talk:Mfield|talk]]) 18:23, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

*Mfield, the surroundings look a lot better and so does the car hood. I can notice very strong artefacts on the A,B and C pillars and the region just below the windows. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Ganeshrg|Ganeshrg]] ([[User talk:Ganeshrg|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Ganeshrg|contribs]]) 04:46, 18 November 2008 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:I am not sure what zoom level you are seeing these at but this is a pretty small resolution to be working with in jpeg so it will have some compression artifacts that will be compounded by PP. If you are referring to noise then I am afraid that really you need to take a better picture to begin with, noise is a side effect of lifting detail out of such shadow unless you are using an expensive camera body at a low ISO. I can add noise reduction but it will lose you some detail. It should be easy enough to shoot this on an overcast day. There is only so much that can be done do rescue information when the image has been shot in in bright sunlight with the subject effectively backlit. [[User:Mfield|Mfield]] ([[User talk:Mfield|talk]]) 05:04, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

::Mfield, I have to comfirm that there are clearly visible compression artifacts in your edit. They probably appeared after you overboosted the red colour of the car. --[[User:Pabouk|pabouk]] ([[User talk:Pabouk|talk]]) 11:37, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

:::I am afraid you are mistaken. I did not boost the red color of the car at all. I performed a shadow lift, which would have made more visible compression artifacts and lack of information in the shadows that were already present. Hence "it will have some compression artifacts that will be compounded by PP". If the car appears more red in my edit it is because it is was converted to the correct sRGB color profile for the web and now appears correctly in your browser. If the car now appears the wrong color then the color was incorrectly captured by the camera or was shifted by whatever editing originally resulted in the image becoming AdobeRGB. The fact of the matter is that it is impossible to pull enough shadow information out of such a poorly lit, underexposed shot that has been saved with both such high jpeg compression. [[User:Mfield|Mfield]] ([[User talk:Mfield|talk]]) 16:12, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

== Image of Salyut 7 ==

{{Stale|1=[[User:DyceBot|DyceBot]] ([[User talk:DyceBot|talk]]) 08:02, 18 December 2008 (UTC)}}

{{GLNF|Salyut 7 from Soyuz T-13.jpg}}

'''Article(s):''' [[Salyut 7]]

'''Request:''' If this image could be restored to a decent quality, that would be fantastic - the view is spectacular, and its one of very, very few images of the Soviet Salyut space stations that is in existence. [[User:Colds7ream|Colds7ream]] ([[User talk:Colds7ream|talk]]) 22:06, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

'''Graphist opinion:''' That looks like a scan from a news paper or magazine. If we can somehow find the original, that would be best. ---[[User:J.smith|J.S]] <small>([[User_talk:J.smith|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/J.smith|C]]/[[WP:WRE|WRE]])</small> 22:12, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

:I did a little cleaning, at least until a new version can be found. --[[user:Pbroks13|<b><font color="black">p<font color="#254117">b<font color="#006600">r<font color="#347C17">ok</font>s</font>1</font>3</font></b>]][[User talk:Pbroks13|^{<font color="#000000">talk?</font>}]] 02:22, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

::Yes, it does look that way, but as the original film is probably buried in a filing cabinet somwhere in Russia or Kazakhstan, we can;t get hold of it. On the other hand, even just that cleanup has made the image look a lot better, so maybe there's hope yet. Thanks! [[User:Colds7ream|Colds7ream]] ([[User talk:Colds7ream|talk]]) 18:06, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

=Resolved=

== Income tax ==