Content deleted Content added
Aaron Schulz (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 268:
: HeadleyDown and other editors, I didn't remove any facts in this submission, only made what was there more concise while keeping the important information. Please read it again with fresh eyes: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Neuro-linguistic_programming&diff=25991965&oldid=25991855] . I'll see if I can edit it to make it more concise. best regards, --[[User:Comaze|Comaze]] 13:04, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
::I have to agree with the revert by Alice. That version is definetely clearer and more complete.[[User:Voice of All(MTG)|'''<font color="blue">Voice</font><font color="darkblue"> of </font> <font color="black">All</font>''']] <sup><small>[[user talk:Voice_of_All%28MTG%29|<font color="blue">@]]<font color="black">'''|'''</font>[[Wikipedia:Esperanza|<font color="darkred">Esperanza</font>]]<font color="black">|[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedians for encyclopedic merit|E M]]</sup></Sup></font></font> 13:34, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
:::Hi Comaze, Headley, ViewOfAll :)
:::As you know I'm still looking at the whole Tenet idea and how it fits with modeling (since these are the 'observable' cues that can be used during modeling and information gathering).
:::Comaze, I like the simplicity of the rep system opening paragraph as it puts it into context. However it's not all there yet... not sure why I think that. Headley, you say it deletes stuff - it may not SAY "5 elements" but it lists the 5 elements. I like that Comaze's version flows and connects eye access cues to the verbal predicates easily, and removes a big paragraph in favour of some simple text. Still.... something missing. Can anyone find a way of putting
:::#these 5 observable elements into context for modeling/information gathering
:::#flowing the 5 elements into the rest of the text...
:::If we can do it, I think it'll improve it.... [[User:GregA|GregA]] 22:28, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
== Extraordinary claims ==
| |||