Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→NPOV and SPOV are aligned with Wikipedia policies: new subsection |
|||
Line 28:
:::I'll pull rank on the rest of you (when it comes to search technology) and say that nothing we do can keep our content out of the search engines, except blanking. The reason is that there are numerous sites that scrape Wikipedia specifically so they can show up in the search rankings. Our robots excluded pages are juicy targets for them, because if Google does not index our version, whoever posts a copy will have what looks like unique content. Therefore, the only solutions are for users to hide behind pseudonyms (an imperfect solution at best, due to the risk of outing), or else we can develop backbones and actually enforce [[WP:NPA]]. I suggest doing the latter. [[User:Jehochman|Jehochman]] <sup>[[User talk:Jehochman|Talk]]</sup> 03:57, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
Isn't this sort of a "welcome to the internet" situation? [[User:Quietmarc|Quietmarc]] ([[User talk:Quietmarc|talk]]) 17:01, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
==SPOV rejection by MastCell==
| |||