Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Graphical Identification and Authentication: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m Listing on WP:DELSORT under Software |
|||
Line 8:
* '''Keep''' Yes, it's not at all well-written. At the very least it needs a short introductory paragraph (which I am not capable of providing, or I would do so). The topic, though, has at least modest significance, and an article on the subject is useful. [[User:Tim Ross|<font color="green" face="courier">'''''Tim Ross'''''</font>]] [[User_talk:Tim Ross|<font color="green" face="courier">(talk)</font>]] 11:13, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
*<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Software|list of Software-related deletion discussions]]. </small> <small>-- [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 11:55, 8 January 2009 (UTC)</small>
*'''Keep''' A secure login mechanism is notable and neither bad writing nor the indiscriminate list are relevant for deletion. Bad writing is specifically excluded as a valid reason for deletion, and the article is not a list, let alone an indiscriminate one. - [[User:MacGyverMagic|Mgm]]|[[User talk:MacGyverMagic|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 11:57, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
| |||