Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/ResearchEditor: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Comment |
→ResearchEditor: Clerk note - blocked / arbcom notified |
||
Line 31:
:Msbvben and Donrus22 demonstrate knowledge of intricate ref formatting from their first edits. These two articles seem to fit in ResearchEditor's topics of interest, so I think a block can be made based on behavior. I haven't looked over the ArbCom decision involving ResearchEditor in its entirety, but does an indefinite block seem appropriate in light of the new sockpuppetry? <span style="background:white;color:#007FFF;font-family:Georgia;">[[User:Nishkid64|Nishkid64]] </span><sub>([[User talk:Nishkid64|Make articles, not wikidrama]])</sub> 21:54, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
::I am currently reading over the ArbCom case, and will make that decision here shortly. Also, consider the other two accounts blocked. [[User:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#4E562C;font-weight:bold">Tiptoety</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#FFDB58">talk</span>]]</sup> 21:55, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
{{clerknote}} {{User|ResearchEditor}} has been indef blocked, and ArbCom has been notified. [[User:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#4E562C;font-weight:bold">Tiptoety</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#FFDB58">talk</span>]]</sup> 22:01, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
<!-- BEGIN ARCHIVE TEMPLATE --><noinclude>
<!--
| |||