Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Encouraged, discouraged and dismayed: My position on policy has been to be a stick-in-the-mud along with a bunch of other editors like Blueboar and Vassyana, and say there is no change necessary |
|||
Line 361:
The policies -NOR especially- was being heavily disrupted to allow more OR in the Chiropractic article. IOW, they were trying to change the policy to get their way in an ongoing debate- at least they were using it that way. '''Please talk to Vassyana about the subject, as he and I were essentially attempting to the exactly the same thing.''' ——'''[[User:Martinphi|<span style="color:#6c4408;border:1px dashed #6c4408;padding:1px;background:#ffffff;">Martin<sup>phi</sup>]]'''</span> [[User talk:Martinphi|Ψ]]~[[Special:Contributions/Martinphi|Φ]]<span style="color:#ffffff;">——</span> 23:34, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
As a ''general'' rule, my position on policy has been to be a stick-in-the-mud along with a bunch of other editors like Blueboar and Vassyana, and say there is no change whatsoever necessary. And, to resist rewriting of policy, such as that done by ScienceApologist on the Fringe guideline. In a few cases, I attempted to clarify, but not change, existing policy. That's the full extent of it, as anyone will see who really goes through the discussions. ——'''[[User:Martinphi|<span style="color:#6c4408;border:1px dashed #6c4408;padding:1px;background:#ffffff;">Martin<sup>phi</sup>]]'''</span> [[User talk:Martinphi|Ψ]]~[[Special:Contributions/Martinphi|Φ]]<span style="color:#ffffff;">——</span> 00:32, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
| |||