Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Line 203:
::::::::::Fyslee does not appear to be making personal attacks. He is explaining his own personal perspective in editing problematic articles; his comments seem helpful. [[User:Mathsci|Mathsci]] ([[User talk:Mathsci|talk]]) 18:42, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
::::::::::: I respectfully disagree, attributing views to someone that they have not stated, and then criticizing them for those views, not only constitute personal attacks, but weak and fallacious arguments. [[User:Dlabtot|Dlabtot]] ([[User talk:Dlabtot|talk]]) 19:12, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
::::::::::::I ''think'' Fyslee is trying to be nice, though it could be taken as condescending, and I'm sure we'd get along fine in real life. I agree with his take on proper conduct and editing, and how the content of NPOV articles will effect users. I simply disagree with his take on my conduct and his assumptions about what I think. ——'''[[User:Martinphi|<span style="color:#6c4408;border:1px dashed #6c4408;padding:1px;background:#ffffff;">Martin<sup>phi</sup>]]'''</span> [[User talk:Martinphi|Ψ]]~[[Special:Contributions/Martinphi|Φ]]<span style="color:#ffffff;">——</span> 01:14, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
== SPOV, [[Pseudoskepticism]] and exceptional claims ==
| |||