Revision as of 01:06, 11 January 2009 edit Martinphi (talk \| contribs) 12,452 edits →Further ← Previous edit		Revision as of 01:19, 11 January 2009 edit undo Martinphi (talk \| contribs) 12,452 edits m →Evidence presented by User:DGG Next edit →
Line 710: ==Evidence presented by [[User:DGG]]== ~~''before using the last evidence template, please make a copy for the next person''~~ Enough of the diffs have been cited above, to indicate that it is not the purpose of SA to assist in giving a NPOV. I don't think he's actually helping present a SPOV either.I I am convinced, convinced every bit as much as SA is, that the SPOV is in fact the only valid approach to the physical world; I think that any unprejudiced person open to reason will realise that when all views are presented objectively. The confidence in this is the reason for the objective pursuit of knowledge, rather than propaganda. Propaganda is unnecessary. The opponents of reason and science are welcome to say everything they can possibly say for it. If the full evidence from all views is presented, the conclusion of anyone able and willing to understand the issues will be the correctness of the SPOV.

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence: Difference between revisions