Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Line 388:
ArbComm suggests that I should stop "needlessly stoking the fires of disputes in the area of fringe science". Looking at recent history on wikipedia, here is what I should do instead : I should ignore this recommendation and continue editing cold fusion despite my being banned there; I should get banned further; I should edit war the WP:Fringe guideline to fight [[pseudoskepticism]] on wikipedia, get banned again; I should rally an army of the night against pseudoskepticism; I should seek the identity of my opponents and get them banned; I should jokingly issue death threats against them, ... The more outrageous I'll be, the more succesfull. At the end, ArbComm will get the message, and I'll get away with "supervised editing". This is what I should do, and I may even have fun doing it. But I won't, as I have other interests in life. [[User:Pcarbonn|Pcarbonn]] ([[User talk:Pcarbonn|talk]]) 03:19, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
:Uh-oh, looks like we've got a [[Empirical research|scientific thinker]] on our hands.
::"Eliminate all other factors, and the one which remains must be the truth." [http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Sherlock_Holmes]. ——'''[[User:Martinphi|<span style="color:#6c4408;border:1px dashed #6c4408;padding:1px;background:#ffffff;">Martin<sup>phi</sup>]]'''</span> [[User talk:Martinphi|Ψ]]~[[Special:Contributions/Martinphi|Φ]]<span style="color:#ffffff;">——</span> 03:51, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
| |||