Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Line 441:
: The claim that this is a BLP violation is simply ridiculous; the fact that there are mentalists who use cold reading is clear. The notion that such a statement would be a BLP violation makes no more sense than claiming the statement "Some Catholic priests have molested altar boys" would be a BLP violation. [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] ([[User talk:JoshuaZ|talk]]) 21:59, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
Some people here don't seem to have read all the diffs. Specific people were claimed to be using those techniques, which is calling them frauds without a source. TS should tell that to Ray Hyman, if he's refuted the Ganzfeld results- he's obviously done some studies which refute them, and therefore should publish. ——'''[[User:Martinphi|<span style="color:#6c4408;border:1px dashed #6c4408;padding:1px;background:#ffffff;">Martin<sup>phi</sup>]]'''</span> [[User talk:Martinphi|Ψ]]~[[Special:Contributions/Martinphi|Φ]]<span style="color:#ffffff;">——</span> 22:32, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
== Block enforcement ==
| |||