Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Evidence: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Line 839:
{{quotation|User is a practicing acupuncturist. He is currently too active in editing these articles and dominating talk page discussions in an attempt to minimize the [[WP:MAINSTREAM|mainstream]] understanding of acupuncture including the fact that there are criticisms of acupuncture for its pseudoscientific aspects and its lack of evidence basis. Indeed, uniquely among many editors on pseudoscience pages, we can be sure that Jim Butler stands to benefit monetarily (at his acupuncture practice) for preventing Wikipedia from reporting on the criticisms of acupuncture and related health items (he is also a fan of the pseudoscientific canard of [[facilitated communication]], though he probably does not get direct compensation for its advocacy).}}
That case was closed because there was no evidence that my edits were biased. Also, since the accusations were baseless, attacking an editor on the basis of his/her affilations violates [[WP:NPA]]. Once again:
:'''"some types of comments are never acceptable:''' ... Using someone's affiliations as a means of dismissing or discrediting their views—regardless of whether said affiliations are mainstream."
| |||