Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Fringe science/Proposed decision: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Tony Sidaway (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 523:
::: As I've remarked several times now: a properly written, neutral point of view article about a fringe topic in science will necessarily inform the reader fully about why it is a fringe topic. Presenting such information in a neutral manner will tend to debunk the topic. In that sense and that sense alone, I am in favor of debunking on Wikipedia. In that sense and that sense alone, we are all debunkers. --[[User talk:Tony Sidaway|TS]] 01:47, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
::::In that sense, I agree with you. As long as there is no OR or SYNTH. Yet, in spite of the fact we agree on this, you keep acting like I'm an advocate. ——'''[[User:Martinphi|<span style="color:#6c4408;border:1px dashed #6c4408;padding:1px;background:#ffffff;">Martin<sup>phi</sup>]]'''</span> [[User talk:Martinphi|Ψ]]~[[Special:Contributions/Martinphi|Φ]]<span style="color:#ffffff;">——</span> 01:54, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
| |||