Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Graphical Identification and Authentication: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Ihcoyc (talk | contribs)
JS: Closing AFD discussion as keep
Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
<!--Template:Afd top
 
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
 
The result was '''keep'''. [[User:Kristen Eriksen|Kristen Eriksen]] ([[User talk:Kristen Eriksen|talk]]) 06:00, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
 
===[[Graphical Identification and Authentication]]===
 
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|T}}
 
:{{la|Graphical Identification and Authentication}} (<span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:Graphical Identification and Authentication|wpReason={{urlencode: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Graphical Identification and Authentication]]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Graphical Identification and Authentication|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2009 January 8#{{anchorencode:Graphical Identification and Authentication}}|View log]])</noinclude>
Line 12 ⟶ 20:
*'''Keep'''. Not intolerably badly written. This is a description of an optional security feature in Microsoft Windows, apparently. The fact that this software is apparently ''from'' Microsoft weighs in its favor, since Microsoft doesn't really need to resort to inserting bogus Wikipedia articles for marketing purposes. - [[User:Ihcoyc|Smerdis of Tlön]] ([[User talk:Ihcoyc|talk]]) 15:23, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
:*'''Comment'''. The page seems to have been substantially re-written from the version that was nominated. - [[User:Ihcoyc|Smerdis of Tlön]] ([[User talk:Ihcoyc|talk]]) 14:56, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
 
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>