Revision as of 18:07, 20 January 2009 edit Dreftymac (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 8,939 edits m →GA Reassessment ← Previous edit		Revision as of 18:11, 20 January 2009 edit undo Dreftymac (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 8,939 edits m →GA Reassessment Next edit →
Line 42: "In between these views is the philosophy that comments are neither beneficial nor harmful by themselves ..." The word "philosophy" is being abused in this article. These are opinions, not philosphies. :: <font color="orange">This issue has been addressed. The word philosophy, (which appeared only once in the prose of the article as far as I could see) was replaced with "assertions".</font> Potentially significant sections such as Metadata and annotations (which is completely uncited) do not adequately cover their topic, thus not meeting the GA broadness criterion.

Talk:Comment (computer programming)/GA1: Difference between revisions