Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Gerry Ashton (talk | contribs) |
Flaviusvulso (talk | contribs) this is a detail that can be hammered out later |
||
Line 774:
:::CBM wrote "exactly the same issue of calendar confusion appears in any date format" which is false. Every ISO 8601 date is either in the Gregorian calendar or wrong. Of course, a Julian date could be written in the YYYY-MM-DD format, '''provided it is made clear that the ISO 8601 standard does not apply to the publication in which the date is written.''' --[[User:Gerry Ashton|Gerry Ashton]] ([[User talk:Gerry Ashton|talk]]) 03:33, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
::::Again this is a detail that can be hammered out later. First we need to determine if the consensus is to use autoformatting or not.
::::[[User:Flaviusvulso|Flaviusvulso]] ([[User talk:Flaviusvulso|talk]]) 03:51, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
|