Log-structured file system: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
SmackBot (talk | contribs)
m Date maintenance tags and general fixes
Line 32:
== Disadvantages ==
 
* The [[design rationale]] for log-structured file systems assumes that most reads will be optimized away by ever-enlarging memory caches. This assumption does not always hold:
** On magnetic media—where seeks are relatively expensive—the log structure may actually make reads much slower, since it [[fragmentation (computer)#External_fragmentation|fragments]] files that conventional file systems normally keep contiguous with in-place writes.
** On flash memory—where seek times are usually negligible—the log structure may not confer a worthwhile performance gain because write fragmentation has much less of an impact on write throughput{{Fact|date=November 2008}}.