Revision as of 21:31, 24 January 2009 edit Ckatz (talk \| contribs) Administrators 82,954 edits →Son of autoformatting would expose us to an extremely risky experiment: reply (x2) ← Previous edit		Revision as of 21:32, 24 January 2009 edit undo TechControl (talk \| contribs) 110 edits →Symbol for bits: bit or b?: Shall we have Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates and numbers)/Proposal on bit symbol ? We now already have two bit symbol threads in this page and lot of talk about Next edit →
Line 1,028: Ref 4 = [[ISO 31]], Ref 5 = [[IEC 60027]]. But [[Bit#Obsolete_definitions]] says IEC is obsolete. Can we stop referring to these obsolete standards? [[User:TechControl\|TechControl]] ([[User talk:TechControl\|talk]]) 21:16, 24 January 2009 (UTC) Shall we have [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates and numbers)/Proposal on bit symbol]] ? We now already have two bit symbol threads in this page and lot of talk about date formatting floating around. [[User:TechControl\|TechControl]] ([[User talk:TechControl\|talk]]) 21:32, 24 January 2009 (UTC) == Son of autoformatting would expose us to an extremely risky experiment ==

Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers: Difference between revisions