Content deleted Content added
MiszaBot II (talk | contribs) m Archiving 5 thread(s) from Template talk:WPBannerMeta. |
MiszaBot II (talk | contribs) m Archiving 2 thread(s) from Template talk:WPBannerMeta. |
||
Line 328:
:Hi, I've changed the docs for that section a bit & added a note about the hook for todo lists. -- [[User:WOSlinker|WOSlinker]] ([[User talk:WOSlinker|talk]]) 07:45, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
== Collapsed notes ==
In the [[Template_talk:WPBannerMeta#COLLAPSED_TEXT_issue|COLLAPSED_TEXT_issue]] section above, it was mentioned that it might be worth spinning off the C_NOTES as a hook. If that's worth doing, then could another hidden category be added, so that they could be converted over to using [[Template:WPBannerMeta/hooks/notes|WPBannerMeta/hooks/notes]] against {{para|COLLAPSED_HOOK}}.
<pre>
{{#if:{{{c note 1|}}}{{{c note 2|}}}{{{c note 3|}}}{{{c note 4|}}}{{{c note 5|}}}|[[Category:WPBannerMeta banners using collapsed notes|{{NAMESPACE}} {{PAGENAME}}]]}}
</pre>
thanks -- [[User:WOSlinker|WOSlinker]] ([[User talk:WOSlinker|talk]]) 12:27, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
:I know, why don't we add tracking categories to monitor ''every'' parameter... <tt>:D</tt> <font color="forestgreen">[[User:Happy-melon|'''Happy''']]</font>‑<font color="darkorange">[[User talk:Happy-melon|'''melon''']]</font> 12:52, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
What's the rationale behind all this converting of collapsed things into hooks? [[User talk:Msgj|Martin]] 13:13, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
:If they're not widely used, the code bytes would be better off given over to extra taskforces, which I ''know'' are in heavy demand (and are more complicated to hook, since they need two separate hooks). I should say, WOSlinker, don't change anything ''yet'' until we see how many templates actually use the cnotes. <font color="forestgreen">[[User:Happy-melon|'''Happy''']]</font>‑<font color="darkorange">[[User talk:Happy-melon|'''melon''']]</font> 14:57, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
::I won't change anything yet. If we go ahead with the change though, the docs could be simplified to the following:
* Example using {{para|c note 1}}
* Explain that more than 5 can be added by using {{para|HOOK_NOTE}} and {{tl|WPBannerMeta/hooks/notes}}
* Explain that collapsible notes can be added by using {{para|HOOK_COLLAPSED}} and {{tl|WPBannerMeta/hooks/notes}}
-- [[User:WOSlinker|WOSlinker]] ([[User talk:WOSlinker|talk]]) 15:14, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
== "Pages" versus "articles" ==
The [[WP:Tennis]] project seems to use "pages" for [[:Category:Category-Class_tennis_pages]], Project-Class tennis pages, Portal-Class tennis pages instead of "articles" like: FA-Class tennis articles, GA-Class tennis articles, etc. This seems "somewhat" coherent to seperate true "articles" from Wikipedia "Pages" that support the functions of Wikipedia. Is there a way to either work this into WPBannerMeta or allow the deviation through a parameter? (or tell me how "|ASSESSMENT_CAT" is supposed to allow this type of naming? -- [[User:Mjquin id|Mjquin_id]] ([[User talk:Mjquin id|talk]]) 20:34, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
:Unfortunately not at the moment. You can have either "articles" or "pages", but all classes need to be the same. [[User talk:Msgj|Martin]] 20:55, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
| |||