HTML editor: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
m fixed spelling/capitalisation
remove a typical swat at Microsoft found in so many computing articles
Line 21:
WYSIWYG editors usually fail to adhere to these rules. This has been the main point of criticism since the first introduction of this editors. Then again, text editors do not provide complete validation for all of these rules either, so valid code still relies on knowledge and accuracy of the coder.
 
While the "valid HTML" arguement still stands, the larger WYSIWYG editors have greatly improved their automated code writing in each version (even [[Microsoft Frontpage]] which in previous versions was notorious for its destruction of valid HTML code).
 
=== HTML is not WYSIWYG ===