Module talk:WikiProject banner/Archive 3: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 08:03, 8 February 2009

Revision as of 08:05, 15 February 2009

Line 664:

:{{done}}, kinda. It works, anyway. <font color="forestgreen">[[User:Happy-melon|'''Happy''']]</font>‑<font color="darkorange">[[User talk:Happy-melon|'''melon''']]</font> 21:42, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

== Peer Review ==

I've been through the list of banners using the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3AWhatLinksHere&target=Template%3AWPBannerMeta%2Fhooks%2Fpeerreview&namespace=10 peerreview hook], to add the <tt><nowiki>|BANNER_NAME={{subst:FULLPAGENAME}}</nowiki></tt> parameter to them so that they show on the template page.

However, it looks like a large number of them don't actually use the peer review system as they just have a red link to a peer review page:

*[[Template:WPReligion]]

*[[Template:WikiProject Ukraine]]

*[[Template:WikiProject Indiana]]

*[[Template:JWProject]]

*[[Template:WPAM]]

*[[Template:WikiProject Nepal]]

*[[Template:WP Bhutan]]

*[[Template:WikiProject Austria]]

*[[Template:WikiProject Colombia]]

*[[Template:WikiProject Iceland]]

*[[Template:Finland]]

*[[Template:WikiProject Estonia]]

*[[Template:WPGC]]

*[[Template:WPES]]

*[[Template:WikiProject Greenland]]

*[[Template:WBLA]]

*[[Template:WPMASH]]

*[[Template:WPMP]]

*[[Template:WikiProject Artix Entertainment]]

*[[Template:Biota of Great Britain and Ireland]]

So, should they be removed from those templates?

Also, there were 4 that were edit protected, so I couldn't do them immediatly:

*[[Template:Philosophy]]

*[[Template:WikiProject Television]]

*[[Template:OH-Project]]

*[[Template:Fishproject]]

If Happy-melon could do them, that would be great. If not then I'll do some editprotected requests later on.

-- [[User:WOSlinker|WOSlinker]] ([[User talk:WOSlinker|talk]]) 20:09, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

:{{done}} the {{para|BANNER_NAME}} for the protected banners. I'd fully support removing any unused functionality from banners; after all, that's what this whole project is about. <font color="forestgreen">[[User:Happy-melon|'''Happy''']]</font>‑<font color="darkorange">[[User talk:Happy-melon|'''melon''']]</font> 21:04, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

::Thanks. I'll leave them a few days and then if nobody has fixed any of them, then I'll remove. -- [[User:WOSlinker|WOSlinker]] ([[User talk:WOSlinker|talk]]) 21:07, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

:::Instead of removing the peer review section from the banners listed above, I've just changed the link to [[Wikipedia:Peer review]]. -- [[User:WOSlinker|WOSlinker]] ([[User talk:WOSlinker|talk]]) 19:17, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

::::If the peer review departments are redlinked, then the project ''clearly'' doesn't use peer review, so there's no point having it in the banner. When an article goes for a wiki-wide peer review it gets a separate banner on the talk page anyway. <font color="forestgreen">[[User:Happy-melon|'''Happy''']]</font>‑<font color="darkorange">[[User talk:Happy-melon|'''melon''']]</font> 14:17, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

== B-Class assessment system ==

Would it be possible to add a hook for a B-Class check-list, like on the [[WP:MILHIST]] banners? That looks useful, and could come in handy. I can't code hooks, so I can't do it myself. '''[[User:Dendodge|<em style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:blue">Den</em><em style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:red">dodge</em>]]''' <small>[[User talk:Dendodge|Talk]]</small>^{[[Special:Contributions/Dendodge|Contribs]]} 12:12, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

:How about {{para|B_CHECKLIST|yes}} <tt>:D</tt>

{{WPBannerMeta/sandbox

|category=no|small=yes

|class=B

|B_CHECKLIST=yes

|QUALITY_SCALE=yes

|PROJECT=Tulips

|BANNER_NAME=Template:WPBannerMeta/sandbox

|IMAGE_LEFT=Tulip - floriade canberra.jpg

}}

:<font color="forestgreen">[[User:Happy-melon|'''Happy''']]</font>‑<font color="darkorange">[[User talk:Happy-melon|'''melon''']]</font> 14:16, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

::/me feels stupid. '''[[User:Dendodge|<em style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:blue">Den</em><em style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:red">dodge</em>]]''' <small>[[User talk:Dendodge|Talk]]</small>^{[[Special:Contributions/Dendodge|Contribs]]} 16:19, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

I've just ammended the above example to highlight a potential concern. Is there not a better way to display the B-Class checklist instructions when the banner is set to small? [[User:PC78|PC78]] ([[User talk:PC78|talk]]) 16:45, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

:I've made ''an'' improvement, although it still makes the banner wider when it's uncollapsed. <font color="forestgreen">[[User:Happy-melon|'''Happy''']]</font>‑<font color="darkorange">[[User talk:Happy-melon|'''melon''']]</font> 16:57, 31 January 2009 (UTC)