Revision as of 10:24, 2 November 2005 edit CBDunkerson (talk \| contribs) Administrators 15,424 edits →Transcript: Forgot signature ← Previous edit		Revision as of 10:30, 2 November 2005 edit undo Rex071404 (talk \| contribs) 7,103 edits →Transcript Next edit →
Line 678: == Transcript == Russ071404, do you really think that this transcript is such a vital and central aspect of the Plame affair that it must be included in the lead? Also, given that you are making assumptions about what Fitzgerald meant, doesn't it make more sense to briefly state the suspected meaning than to quote a large block of text? Finally, isn't it usual practice to put a comment on the talk page when reverting to explain the reasons and discuss possible compromise? --[[User:CBDunkerson\|CBDunkerson]] 10:24, 2 November 2005 (UTC) :I make no assumptions in the article. Rather, I merely quote the very relevant single Q&A about investigation status. [[User:Rex071404\|Rex071404]] <sup><b> [[User:216.153.214.94\|216.153.214.94]] </sup></b> 10:30, 2 November 2005 (UTC)

Talk:Plame affair: Difference between revisions