Wikipedia:Peer review/Python (programming language)/archive1: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Cybercobra (talk | contribs) |
Cybercobra (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 29:
It seems to me that discussion of the language's type system and object system could be more carefully separated from the list of built-in types. (And there's some interesting history to be discussed there, notably type/class unification and the whole old-style/new-style classes thing.)
:[[Image:Yes check.svg|20px]] '''Done''', although I don't personally have enough time to write on old vs new style classes at the moment, so I added a notice template about it. --[[User:Cybercobra|Cybercobra]] ([[User talk:Cybercobra|talk]]) 22:29, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
Speaking of types, there are a few places where "statically typed" is used to mean "explicitly typed" (i.e. C/Java-like), which is an error.
:[[Image:Yes check.svg|20px]] '''Done''', and it's [[manifest typing]] for the record :-) --[[User:Cybercobra|Cybercobra]] ([[User talk:Cybercobra|talk]]) 21:48, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
| |||