Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Line 17:
<!--PLEASE PLACE NEW REQUESTS BELOW HERE-->
<!--PLEASE PLACE NEW REQUESTS BELOW THIS NOTICE -->
== [[User:NoCal100]] [[WP:WAR]]ing and [[WP:HOUND]]ing over several articles ==
Line 259 ⟶ 260:
I need a re-instatement of the revert parole under [[WP:ARBMAC]] currently still in force (since August) for {{user|Jingiby}}, which he has been systematically ignoring despite warnings ([[User talk:Jingiby#Oh man...|here]] and [[User talk:Future Perfect at Sunrise#National liberation war of Macedonia|here]]). Latest reversion spree on [[Military history of Bulgaria during World War II]]. I've made the mistake of closing an eye on his infractions from time to time recently, which has evidently emboldened him, and right now I'm involved in the dispute with him, so I'd be grateful if somebody else could take action. [[User:Future Perfect at Sunrise|Fut.Perf.]] [[User talk:Future Perfect at Sunrise|☼]] 11:12, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
:I have blocked for a week. That will expire close to the end of the revert parole, at which point it should be reviewed, given the lack of success of the sanctions applied so far. [[User:Kevin|Kevin]] ([[User talk:Kevin|talk]]) 11:30, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
== [[User:Sarah777]] and myself on [[Talk:Dunmanway Massacre]] - Troubles related article ==
* '''Who:''' {{User|1=Sarah777}}
* '''Who:''' {{User|1=blowdart}}
* '''What:''' 1RR breach on a talk page, relating to a change of the WikiProject Ireland importance rating of the article.
'''Background:''' Sarah777 objects to the Mid rating of the article on the Wikiproject Ireland scale and set it to low without consensus. Since then we (and others) have been setting it back and forth and back and forth. Sarah has now used what I perceive as the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Dunmanway_Massacre&oldid=271934507 threat] of an ArbCom ruling to keep the rating at her preferred choice. She says there is no consensus to change it back to mid, however there is no consensus to put it to low either, and there has been no discussion on the WikiProject Ireland talk page to get one either.
This is both for a request from myself for clarity (are project ratings covered by the Troubles 1RR rating?) and as a good example of why 1RR doesn't work well when it can be used to stop edits by timing rather than consensus. --[[User:Blowdart|Blowdart]] | [[User talk:Blowdart|''<sup>talk</sup>'']] 22:50, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
| |||